RBC Economics Breaks Down Canada's 237-Page Fall Economic Update
Written by Colin Guldimann | Published on December 1, 2020
Written by Colin Guldimann | Published on December 1, 2020
This report was first published by RBC Economics on Nov. 30 under the title, “Economic Statement Adds Red Ink, Leaves Details of Stimulus for Later.”
It's been nearly five months since the government updated us on its most expansive period of spending ever, and nearly 18 months since its last formal five-year budget. When the government last tabled a full budget, terms like PPE and vaccine agreement weren't in most Canadians' vocabulary. Today's update packed a slightly improved economic outlook, a worsening deficit, and the potential for significant future stimulus into one 237-page package. In a normal year, any of those items would be noteworthy, but together, they sum to historic spending. Here's what stuck out to us in today's report:
Ottawa told us it will spend nearly $382 billion more than it takes in 2020-21, as the government's response to COVID-19 adds $275 billion to program costs. This is $39 billion higher than forecast in the July fiscal snapshot, mostly due to new spending. And, the fiscal update includes a six-year forecast, projecting the 2021-22 and 2022-23 deficits at $121 billion and $51 billion, respectively, before any major spending initiatives linked to commitments made in the fall Speech from the Throne.
The biggest wild-card in today's announcement will be revealed only in the spring budget: how the government will spend $70-100 billion in additional stimulus it will undertake over the next three years. While this will push program spending much higher in the medium-term, the update takes pains to suggest this stimulus would be temporary and growth oriented. Only time will tell.
While uncertainty has narrowed, there are still risks to the spending outlook
Uptake on support programs may not be exactly as the government expects, as they revised down their expected cost by $27 billion. Economic developments since July improved the fiscal outlook by $14 billion relative to what they expected at the time. Program expansions, additional PPE, funding for long term care homes, and for testing added to overall costs. Altogether, spending since July cost $79 billion over two years and today's announcements added about $52 billion over the same period. At the same time revenues have fallen, recovering over the next few years.
The range of estimates for economic activity has narrowed significantly since July's snapshot, but uncertainty around the economic impact of lockdowns over the winter remains. The government outlined two potential scenarios in which public health restrictions worsen the deficit. A scenario in which outbreaks lead to closures, but are limited to high-contact services like restaurants and entertainment, could add $7 billion to the deficit in each of this year and next. A worse scenario with more significant lockdowns, limiting activity to essential outings like in the spring, would more than double this impact to $16 billion annually.
The government's stimulus plan for the $70-100 billion it has penciled in over three years, depending on how the labour market indicates the economy is doing, adds to that uncertainty. We got little in terms of rules for this spending, with the update suggesting details would be ironed out in the spring budget. If those supports lean towards the income-supporting transfers we've seen so far, and are delivered later in the five-year forecast, they could add stimulus when it's no longer required. Accordingly, we hope Budget 2021 outlines a plan for growth-enhancing stimulus investments that help tackle a growing national debt (which will peak at 52.6 per cent of GDP, without added stimulus).
The government has indicated stimulus funds will be for temporary programs, which suggests increases in debt may be quick to arrive and worsen the picture only slightly. Still, they note that a new fiscal anchor will only be introduced when the economy is more stable, which leaves much up in the air for now.
Extended support for businesses
Extensions of the CEWS and rent subsidy were major additions to today's announcement. The wage subsidy will carry through June 2021, but today the government announced the program would be more generous in response to a second wave: The maximum subsidy rate will increase to 75% until mid-March, rather than decreasing as the government had previously planned. The current subsidy rate for rent and additional support for locked down firms was also extended through to mid-March. These enhanced programs, if taken up as expected, will cost an additional $16 billion this year and next, and provide critical support for Canadian firms, and their employees.
The government further announced targeted support for hard-hit sectors as we previewed last week, covering regional airlines, airports, the arts and live events sector, and tourism and hospitality. Support will mostly come in the form of low-interest loans over terms up to ten years. Structured as loans, this support should cost the federal government relatively little (in the form of potential loan losses and interest on the debt used to fund loans), but given the already high debt loads of Canadian firms, it may not see significant uptake. Still, these firms will be supported by the other programs above for some time yet.
Stimulus spending thus far is relatively contained and growth-oriented
As we guessed in our preview, most of the spending today was in the form of these extensions of programs that bridge businesses to the other side of the crisis. Still, targeted stimulus of nearly $13.5 billion over 6 years indicates where the government may focus future stimulus measures. This would, in normal years, be considered significant spending.
The government penciled in a temporary increase in the Canada Child Benefit for Canadians with children under six, targeted at those with low and middle incomes, totaling $2.4 billion in new spending. The payment should help support those struggling to afford childcare on fewer hours of work, but leaves more comprehensive changes to Canada's childcare system for later budgets. Investments to support hiring of early childhood educators could signal the kind of programs the federal government is looking at.
Climate change spending will see some significant funding later in the five year forecast period, with investments in nature-based climate solutions (e.g., tree planting), an extension of the government's support for zero emission vehicles, and building retrofits by homeowners. The government signaled support for a border carbon adjustment, which would effectively apply Canada's carbon tax to imported goods and services, though promised to work with international partners to make sure the system was fair for businesses. We'll have to wait and see how meaningful such a system would be for Canadian businesses, who may see their exports taxed by other countries, too.
Investments aimed at supporting skills and training, in particular for youth and indigenous people will add $1.2 billion to spending, including by eliminating interest on student loans in 2020-21, beefing up summer jobs programs, and job placements. This addresses the larger impact the recession has had on young people, and help reduce longer term labour market impacts for these groups.
Revenues measures were targeted, and limited
The government announced efforts to apply sales taxes to digital goods and services, as well as sales from online platforms that fulfill orders from large warehouses in Canada. It also intends to apply corporate income tax to these entities, working faster than international bodies who have tried to coordinate a response across developed countries. While the tax lift is moderate, $6.5 billion over five years, these investments put the desire to raise revenues in sharp relief.
What may once have been considered a significant tax proposal, now pales in comparison to the potential for long-term deficits. The debt will accordingly rise this year and next, before slowly falling. But additional stimulus isn't yet accounted for, and could keep debt rising for longer. The government may then be tempted to look for new, more significant revenue sources.
Financial requirements are lower than expected
Despite the higher deficit, financial requirements for 2020/21 were revised down from $469 billion in the July snapshot to $448 billion today. Increased spending was more than offset by the removal of $50 billion in insured mortgage purchases. Aggregate bond issuance of $374 billion tracks recent auctions sizes and the frequency for each sector: The $35 billion decline is in short-term bonds (2-year, 3-year, and 5-year), while 10-year ($74 billion) and 30-year ($32 billion) sectors were maintained at the same levels as July and are a slightly higher proportion of bond issuance. The main surprise was an increase in the planned FY-end Treasury bill stock to $329 billion, a $35 billion increase from the July snapshot and well above recent tracking of closer to $250 billion. The offsetting changes in bonds and bills combine with a smaller financial requirement to imply about a $21 billion increase in the planned Government of Canada cash balance at FY-end. Looking ahead, the government is projecting financial requirements of $118 billion in 2021/22 and $26 billion in 2022/23, the latter reflecting some repayment of CEBA loans. Neither of those numbers include any of the aggregate $70-100 billion in additional stimulus set aside for 2021/22 through 2023/24.
Find the full report at rbc.com/economics.
Colin Guldimann is an economist at RBC. He works primarily on issues related to the public sector, energy, and climate change.
RBC Direct Investing Inc. and Royal Bank of Canada are separate corporate entities which are affiliated. RBC Direct Investing Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada and is a Member of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and the Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Royal Bank of Canada and certain of its issuers are related to RBC Direct Investing Inc. RBC Direct Investing Inc. does not provide investment advice or recommendations regarding the purchase or sale of any securities. Investors are responsible for their own investment decisions. RBC Direct Investing is a business name used by RBC Direct Investing Inc. ® / ™ Trademark(s) of Royal Bank of Canada. RBC and Royal Bank are registered trademarks of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under licence.
© Royal Bank of Canada 2025.
Any information, opinions or views provided in this document, including hyperlinks to the RBC Direct Investing Inc. website or the websites of its affiliates or third parties, are for your general information only, and are not intended to provide legal, investment, financial, accounting, tax or other professional advice. While information presented is believed to be factual and current, its accuracy is not guaranteed and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the author(s) as of the date of publication and are subject to change. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by RBC Direct Investing Inc. or its affiliates. You should consult with your advisor before taking any action based upon the information contained in this document.
Furthermore, the products, services and securities referred to in this publication are only available in Canada and other jurisdictions where they may be legally offered for sale. Information available on the RBC Direct Investing website is intended for access by residents of Canada only, and should not be accessed from any jurisdiction outside Canada.
Valerie Grimba unpacks emerging ETF trends and insights
What the Inspired Investor team is watching
Tariff-driven job losses emerge, yet some see reason for optimism